I posted earlier today a comment by Susan Chyn, saying that she was sorry for students who have to take the PARCC test. She explained why she thought the test was not a good test. My description of her left the impression that she was tutoring students for PARCC, but this was incorrect. She tutors students in English language arts, especially literature and writing. She has worked in the standardized testing industry, which gives her insight into the deep flaws of PARCC. Some readers made baseless accusations that she was somehow profiting by tutoring students for PARCC. She is a tutor, period. She helps students prepare for the work in school and for the tests. She should not be criticized for being a tutor or for working in the testing industry. She is a knowledgeable critic of PARCC because of her own experience, and I thank her for her comments and welcome more.