Cardona Connecticut Data Education Reform Graduation rates Miguel Real Education

Ann Cronin: Miguel Cardona, What Is Your Vision for American Education?

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Ann P. Cronin is a former Connecticut Distinguished English Teacher of the Year, a school district administrator, and creator of award-winning programs for the teaching of English in middle schools and high schools. At her blog, she asks about Miguel Cardona’s vision for the future.

She writes:

When I ask Connecticut teachers about Miguel Cardona, those who know him or have worked with him say that he is really nice guy who knows what the challenges in our classrooms are, knows how to help teachers to improve their teaching, and respects public schools. All good.

The majority of Connecticut teachers who don’t know him personally say that he has been largely quiet as Commissioner and are critical that he seems more interested in keeping schools open than in caring about public health, including the welfare of teachers, students and students’ families during the pandemic. 

But what is his vision for teaching and learning that he will bring to the U.S. Department of Education? When appointed Commissioner of Education in Connecticut 19 months ago, he stated that his goals would be to:

  1. Make a positive impact on graduation rates.
  2. Close the achievement gap.
  3. Ensure that all students have increased access to opportunities and advantages that they need to succeed in life.

It is reasonable to assume that the goals he had for Connecticut 19 months ago will be goals that he will now bring to the country. Those goals, however, are “old hat” and don’t have a record of being successfully accomplished.

The goals themselves are worthy ones, but they need a new interpretation which would give rise to a dramatically new vision and radical new actions. The questions are: What would that new vision and new actions look like? And is Dr. Cardona open to that vision and those actions?

Cronin points out that it easy to “raise the graduation rate,” as many districts now do, by offering “credit retrieval” or “credit recovery” courses, a quick computer course that involves minimal learning but provides credits. The goal ought to be, she says, not raising the graduation rate but something like the graduating of well-educated high school students. Currently, graduation rates make good headlines but can mean very little in terms of student learning.

Charter schools have mastered the trick of raising graduation rates by pushing out students who are unlikely to graduate on time.

She asks for something more: a genuine vision that involves improving the quality of education, not improving the data.

How refreshing!

Related posts

Wisconsin: Right-Wing Bradley Foundation Spent $108 Million to Privatize Public Education

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Trump’s Unhinged Rant Against Immigrants in Ohio

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Tom Ultican: Who Paid to Make Indianapolis the Second Most Privatized School District in the Nation?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Ken Bernstein on the Democratic Debate

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

California: Is Governor Gavin Newsom Selling Out to the Charter Industry?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Edweek on the Future of Opt Out Movement

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Jeff Bryant: DeVos Is Gone, But the Voucher Movement Presses Forward

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Peter Greene: Believe It or Not: Scott Walker Running as “Education Governor”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Teacher: The Néw High School Equivalency Exam is a Travesty

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment