Betsy DeVos Charter Schools Elections Philadelphia Privatization School Choice Trump Vouchers

As Trump Era Ends, “School Choice Movement” Must Confront Its Conservative Roots

Interesting essay samples and examples on:

Avi Wolfman-Arent writes at the Philadelphia PBS website WHYY about the uncomfortable dilemma of the “school choice movement.” At least some of the choice champions had not come to grips with the fact that their movement was funded by Trump supporters. Perhaps the reckoning might have caused them to wonder if they were being used. It’s easy to forget–or perhaps never realize–that the school choice movement was created by Southern segregationists, borrowing the rhetoric of libertarian economist Milton Friedman. It i worth pondering why and how the Democratic Party abandoned its longstanding belief in equitable, well-resourced public schools as a common good.

He begins:

When Philadelphia-area mega-donors Jeff and Janine Yass made headlines recently for their contributions to Republican politicians — some of whom tried to overturn the presidential election — it stirred up a familiar debate in local education circles.

The Yass family has a long history of donating to Republican politicians and conservative causes. They also are among the largest donors to Pennsylvania’s school choice movement.

Therein lies a dilemma that, for some Democrats who support school choice, has caused increasing bouts of self-reflection.

On the ground, many charter school employees and school choice advocates are left-of-center, motivated by a desire to shake up an educational system that they see as not acting urgently enough to help low-income students of color.

But the movement’s growth — and success — has long relied on the political and financial capital of conservatives, who see school choice as a way to inject free-market thinking into the educational bureaucracy.

None of this is new.

What’s new is the reckoning forced by the Trump era, culminating in a violent insurrection that was fomented by Republican lawmakers — carried out with symbols of the Confederacy — who, on other days, could be a charter advocate’s best ally.

“For a period of time, this coalition was able to exist without some of the tensions we’re talking about threatening to rip it apart,” said Mike Wang, a veteran of the Philadelphia education scene who once headed a leading school choice advocacy group that lobbied in Harrisburg.

Will this unusual alliance survive? Can it find new political strength under an administration promising reconciliation and unity? Or will it disintegrate in an era of increasing political polarity?

At what point do well-meaning liberals understand that there is a fundamental contradiction between the free market and equity. The free market produces winners and losers, not equity.

Related posts

Kenneth Zeichner: Why Betsy DeVos is Unfit to be Secretary of Education


Contact the NAACP and Urge Them to Support Their General Assembly’s Resolution for Moratorium on Charters


Mike Rose: Keepin’ Up with the Trumps, One Budget Cut at a Time


Purdue Buys Online, For-Profit Kaplan, Over Faculty Objections University


Danielle Holly: Billionaires are Undermining Democracy By Their “Investments” in Education


It’s Official:NLRB Says Charter Schools Are Not Public Schools


How Millionaires Make Money by Paying into Voucher Fund


John H. Jackson: Why is School Choice the Black Choice?


“The Demolition of American Education,” By Trump and DeVos


Leave a Comment