Accountability Charter Schools Corporate Reformers Education Industry For-Profit Ohio Privatization

ECOT’s Secret Sauce: Money, Money, Money.

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Denis Smith worked in the Ohio charter school office, and he saw the combustible mix of deregulation, money, and politics. This is a combination sure to produce scandal. And it has.

Smith reports here on the biggest scandal: the Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow (ECOT). It has the lowest graduation rate in the nation, according to the New York Times. It is a for-profit virtual charter. Its owner William Lager is one of the state’s major donors to the Republican Party. His patrons protect him from scrutiny or accountability.

One of the supporters of ECOT is Andrew Brenner, chairman of the Ohio House Education Committee. He despises public schools.

Brenner has said previously that “public education is socialism.” But if we follow the Chairman’s logic (hmm, I thought only well-known socialists and collectivists like Mao Zedong and Leonid Brezhnev were referred to as Chairman), we find illogic, viz., the Chairman of the Education Committee seems very much opposed to public education.

But the illogic gets worse.

Profits generated from the public funds received by charter school operators like Lager and White Hat Management’s David Brennan flow to their favorite Republican politicians in the form of contributions. These profits, snared by privately operated management companies with hand-picked, unelected boards not subject to full public transparency and exempt from 150 sections of state law, ultimately wind their way to committee chairs in the legislature as well as more senior leadership in the House and Senate.

To Chairman Brenner, this is capitalism at work. And capitalism is the very opposite of socialism, right? Yes socialism, as evidenced by the operation of public school districts who raise their revenue from the taxation of local property and who are subject to full legal transparency and accountability, governed by a group of citizens elected by qualified voters in the community where they operate. These are community schools, the real public schools. Contrast that with charter schools, where, unlike public schools, there is no requirement for board members to be qualified voters, viz. citizens.

I wonder why Republicans aren’t in favor of requiring proof of citizenship for charter school board members, as they are for some voters. Hmmm.

Public money for private purposes.

Related posts

Andrea Gabor: Betsy DeVos’s Voucher Obsession Could Boomerang on Republicans

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

New York: SUNY Committee Votes to Lower Standards for Charter Teachers

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Poverty and Stress Can Damage Children’s Lives

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

California: Court Decision Stuns Charter Industry and Threatens Stealth Charters

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Where Do Democrats Stand on Ed Reform?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

A Teacher in an Albany Charter That Closed Describes the Situation

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Jane Nylund: Oakland Is in the Sights of the “Destroy Public Education” Crowd, Who Control the Board

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Missouri: New State School Board Uncertain About How to Evaluate Charters

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Do Testing and Accountability Promote Critical Thinking?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment