NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Race to the Top Testing

Jeff Bryant: Making Sense of the Testing Debate

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Jeff Bryant analyzes the debate about the federal testing mandates and concludes it’s all about politics, not education.

By now, it is obvious that the testing required by “No Child Left Behind” did not leave no child behind. Child poverty, which is the root cause of low test scores, has increased, and testing does nothing to reduce it.

Bryant writes:

“How is the debate going? See if this makes sense to you:

“Conservatives want to let states have potentially more options for wasting taxpayer money on wayward attempts in “accountability,” and liberals are insisting on continuing measures that have been mostly bad for the education of black and brown students.

“Huh?”

According to the Southern Education Foundation, 51% of public school pupils–a new majority–are poor. More testing does not reduce poverty.

Bryant writes:

“Tests do uncover disparities in our education system, as the National Assessment of Education Progress has revealed for many years long before NCLB. Gerwerz, again, at Education Week, notes about NAEP, “When I look at it, I see the absence of nearly every single trigger point in today’s testing debates. Every kid required to sit for hours and hours of tests? Nope. Here we have only two hours of testing, given to a sample of the school’s students. Weeks of test prep? Nope. Students tied in knots over potentially bad test scores? Nope.”

“Further, as [Bruce] Baker concludes in a subsequent post, if the federal government really wanted to do something about inequities in our education system, it would develop policies that gave states more incentive to correct what’s really causing inequities: the ways “in which our schools are organized and segregated.”
Why isn’t anyone talking about this? Because the discussion over testing, at least how it’s being carried out in Washington, DC, isn’t really about education. It’s about power politics. Seen in this frame, it’s really hard to believe the Democrats are going to win.”

Related posts

Peter Greene Weighs in on the Great Debate about “Next Generation Assessments”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leonie Haimson: The New York Teacher Evaluation Mess

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Gary Rubinstein: How Did Success Academy Students Perform on New York Regents’ Exams?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Florida: Charters in Duval County Get Lower Test Scores than Public Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Maine Teacher Wins $1 Million Prize, Advises Young People Not to Enter Teaching Because of Common Core and Testing

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Laura H. Chapman: College and Career Standards for K-2?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Mercedes Schneider: Part 4 of Her Close Reading of the Alexander-Murray Bill to Reauthorize NCLB

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Helen Ladd Debates Marty West: “Getting Our Money’s Worth in Education”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Mercedes Schneider: The New Research on New Orleans is a Hoax

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment