Accountability Charter Schools Democracy Education Industry Education Reform Funding Inequity Innovation Massachusetts New Orleans Privatization Segregation

Jonathan Rodrigues: When Segregation Is the Innovation

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

So what are “Innovation Partnership Zones” (IPZs), and what would the governor’s bill do? It’s important to note here this idea has prominent Democratic support as well, it was only last year that Education Committee co-chair Alice Peisch (D-Wellesley) and Senator Eric Lesser (D-Longmeadow) sponsored very similar legislation.

The bill allows groups of 2 schools or more (or one school with more than 1,000 students) to create an IPZ which would allow an outside organization to manage these schools and give the “zone” autonomy over things like budget, hiring, curriculum, etc. Essentially third-partying away the public good, but doesn’t “partnership” sounds so much better than “takeover”?

The IPZ can be triggered in two main ways.

  1. Through local initiative of school committee members, a superintendent, a mayor, a teachers group or union, and parents. .
  2. Through the state’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Commissioner’s choice from schools determined to be “underperforming” by high stakes testing metrics.

The process would then call for proposals jointly with an outside entity that may include nonprofit charter operators and higher ed institutions….

If past is prologue, the results should look familiar. Brown University Annenberg Institute’s 2016 report “Whose Schools?” analyzed the board composition of charter schools in Massachusetts. 60% of charter schools in the Commonwealth had no parent representation at all. 31% of charter board members were from the corporate sector, heavily from finance.

We should all look forward to our IPZs filled with executives from places like TD Bank, who certainly might live in the “region,”, but have no respect for Boston’s biggest neighborhood.

It is especially worrisome that IPZs will be inevitably pushed on communities of color, continuing a nationwide trend of stripping away voice from families of color from Philadelphia to Chicago, Detroit to New Orleans.

A 2015 Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools “Out Of Control” report examined the disenfranchisement of black and brown families through mechanisms such as appointed school boards, and state and district turnovers. In their 2014–15 analysis, there were 113 state takeover districts nationwide. 96 were handed to charter operators. 98% of affected students were Black and/or Latinx. In New Orleans, parents had to navigate 44 different governing authorities; in Detroit, 45.

The most important innovation of all would be the full funding of schools in poor communities.

He concludes:

In no place where black and brown families are the majority in the school district is the innovation of a fully funded quality public school with adequate staffing, special education services, mental health supports, art and music, full-time librarians, and school nurses ever even attempted.

 

Related posts

Leonie Haimson: Is Colorado’s Rebuke to DFER a Turning Point in the Battle Against Privatization?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Jesse Hagopian: The Black Resistance to Charters and Corporate Reform is Just Beginning

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Best Quotes of the Day from Readers

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Dora Taylor: Snuffing Out Democracy with Mayoral Control and Emergency Managers

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Wendy Lecker on That Disappointing Judicial Decision in Connecticut

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

The Danielson Rubric for a Highly Effective Thanksgiving! Laugh Out Loud!

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Teacher Ed: Help, ACLU! Get to the Bottom of Racketeering in Education

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Nancy Bailey: Is EdTrust Behind the Renewal of Standardized Testing?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Arne Duncan: The U.S. Education System “Is Not Top Ten in Anything”… It “Runs on Lies”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment