Accountability Administrators Budget Cuts Charter Schools Education Industry Funding Honor Roll Michigan Privatization superintendents Supporting public schools Teacher Evaluations Teachers and Teaching

Michigan Superintendent: How to Kill a Profession

Interesting essay samples and examples on:

Steve Matthews, superintendent of the Novi school district, here explains how the education profession has been attacked and demonized, with premeditation.


He begins:


So you want to kill a profession.


It’s easy.


First you demonize the profession. To do this you will need a well-organized, broad-based public relations campaign that casts everyone associated with the profession as incompetent and doing harm. As an example, a well-orchestrated public relations campaign could get the front cover of a historically influential magazine to invoke an image that those associated with the profession are “rotten apples.”


Then you remove revenue control from the budget responsibilities of those at the local level. Then you tell the organization to run like a business which they clearly cannot do because they no longer have control of the revenue. As an example, you could create a system that places the control for revenue in the hands of the state legislature instead of with the local school board or local community.


Then you provide revenue that gives a local agency two choices: Give raises and go into deficit or don’t give raises so that you can maintain a fund balance but in the process demoralize employees. As an example, in Michigan there are school districts that have little to no fund balance who have continued to give raises to employees and you have school districts that have relatively healthy fund balances that have not given employees raises for several years.


Then have the state tell the local agency that it must tighten its belt to balance revenue and expenses. The underlying, unspoken assumption being that the employees will take up the slack and pay for needed supplies out of their own pockets.


Additionally , introduce “independent” charters so that “competition” and “market-forces” will “drive” the industry. However, many of these charters, when examined, give the illusion of a better environment but when examined show no improvement in service. The charters also offer no comprehensive benefits or significantly fewer benefits for employees. So the charters offer no better quality for “customers” and no security for employees but they ravage the local environment.


Then create a state-mandated evaluation system in an effort to improve quality…..


That is how it begins.


For his willingness to speak out honestly and courageously, I add Steve Matthews to the blog’s honor roll as a hero of public education.




Related posts

Sue Legg on the Chaotic School Choice Mess in Florida


Oklahoma: For-Profit Online Charter Chain Gobbles Up Rural Districts


Mercedes Schneider Asks: Who Is Jon Schnur and Why Does It Matter?


Michael Moore: Arrest Governor Rick Snyder of Michigan


Tony Thurmond: “Without Public Schools, I Might Not Be State Superintendent Today”


Peter Greene: Trump Supports DeVos’ Efforts to Punish Students Who Were Scammed


Arkansas: The Abusive Treatment of a First-Year Music Teacher


Valerie Strauss Posts a Portrait of Nashville Leader Amy Frogge, from SLAYING GOLIATH


As Common Core Testing Groups Shrivel, Gates Drops in More Money


Leave a Comment