Common Core Missouri Testing

Missouri Judge Blocks Payment to Common Core Connsortium

Interesting essay samples and examples on:

Duane Swacker says:

From one of the plaintiffs blog:

Fred Sauer Prevails in Common Core Suit Against Gov. Nixon

Date February 25, 2015

Posted by molly

Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Contact: (314) 854-1305
Missouri Court Rules That the “Interstate Consortium” Implementing Common Core Assessments Is Unconstitutional

Jefferson City, Missouri. On February 24, 2015, the Circuit Court for Cole County, Missouri ruled in favor of Missouri taxpayer plaintiffs Fred N. Sauer, Anne Gassel, and Gretchen Logue in their constitutional challenge to one of two interstate entities charged with implementing Common Core.

The Court blocked the payment of $4.3 million of Missouri taxpayer funds as membership fees to the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, an interstate organization that is implementing tests aligned to the Common Core State Standards (“Common Core”).

The Court’s Judgment states: “The Court finds that the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium . . . is an unlawful interstate compact to which the U.S. Congress has never consented, whose existence and operation violate the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 10, cl. 3, as well as numerous federal statutes; and that Missouri’s participation in the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium as a member is unlawful under state and federal law.”

Plaintiff Fred N. Sauer stated: “The Court’s judgment recognizes the reality that the interstate ‘consortia’ charged with writing and implementing the tests aligned with Common Core are, and have always been, unconstitutional interstate compacts. Missouri should not be a member of such an illegal entity.”

The Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution states that “No State shall, without the consent of Congress … enter into any Agreement or Compact with any other State.” In their lawsuit, Sauer, Gassel, and Logue contended that the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium is an unconstitutional compact because (1) it undermines the authority of the U.S. Congress, which has passed numerous federal statutes forbidding the establishment of a national curriculum; (2) it threatens the sovereignty of member States by forcing them to cede some of their control over educational policy within their borders to an interstate entity; and (3) it threatens the sovereignty of non-member States by seeking to create an educational “cartel” aligned with Common Core.

Related posts

Andrea Gabor: Joel Klein Spends an Evening with His Friends at TFA, Berating Public Schools


Choice Advocates: Test Scores Don’t Really Matter All That Much


Jersey Jazzman Tries to Make Sense of Cuomo’s Teacher Evaluation Law


Federal Testing Policy: A Fourth Option?


Our Dam Poet on the Billionaires’ Burden


Brookline, Mass., Meets Corporate Reform


Nancy Bailey: The Haunted Third Grade Classroom That Traps Children


Juan Gonzalez on New York’s Historic Opt Out from State Testing


New York: Add Your Name in Support of Bill to Affirm Parents’ Right to Opt Out of State Testing!


Leave a Comment