Accountability Cheating District of Columbia Education Reform Michelle Rhee Standardized Testing

Richard Phelps Reviews Michelle Rhee’s Reforms, Part 2

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Richard Phelps was in charge of assessment in the last year of the reign of Michelle Rhee as superintendent of the District of Columbia Public Schools. In this post, he describes how difficult and time-consuming it is to identify test cheating and how little the D.C. leadership cared about making the effort. Phelps was supposed to monitor test security and expand testing.

He writes:

The recurring test cheating scandals of the Rhee-Henderson years may seem extraordinary but, in fairness, DCPS was more likely than the average US school district to be caught because it received a much higher degree of scrutiny. Given how tests are typically administered in this country, the incidence of cheating is likely far greater than news accounts suggest, for several reasons:

· in most cases, those who administer tests—schoolteachers and administrators—have an interest in their results;
· test security protocols are numerous and complicated yet, nonetheless, the responsibility of non-expert ordinary school personnel, guaranteeing their inconsistent application across schools and over time;
· after-the-fact statistical analyses are not legal proof—the odds of a certain amount of wrong-to-right erasures in a single classroom on a paper-and-pencil test being coincidental may be a thousand to one, but one-in-a-thousand is still legally plausible; and
· after-the-fact investigations based on interviews are time-consuming, scattershot, and uneven.

Still, there were measures that the Rhee-Henderson administrations could have adopted to substantially reduce the incidence of cheating, but they chose none that might have been effective. Rather, they dug in their heels, insisted that only a few schools had issues, which they thoroughly resolved, and repeatedly denied any systematic problem.

He punctures Rhee’s claim that the test security agency Caveon never found evidence of “systematic cheating.”

He writes:

Caveon, however, had not looked for “systematic” cheating. All they did was interview a few people at several schools where the statistical anomalies were more extraordinary than at others. As none of those individuals would admit to knowingly cheating, Caveon branded all their excuses as “plausible” explanations. That’s it; that is all that Caveon did. But, Caveon’s statement that they found no evidence of “widespread” cheating—despite not having looked for it—would be frequently invoked by DCPS leaders over the next several years.

Related posts

What Kind of a School Fines a Departing Teacher $6,087 for “Liquidated Damages”?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Trump Orders Top Brass to Plan a Grand Military Parade Like the One He Saw in France

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Mercedes Schneider on Tenure at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

New D.C. Chancellor Antwan Wilson is Out

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Say No to Trump’s Vouchers

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

DFER (Hedge Fund Managers) Compare Hillary and Bernie

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Indiana’s Virtual Charters: “How Long Do We Let Them Fail”?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Another Billionaire Weighs in Against DeVos

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Gene Bruskin: The Story Behind the Gulen Charter Schools and Their Reclusive Founder

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment