Education Reform History Hoax Hope Innovation Technology

Victoria E.M. Cain: A Brief and Sobering History of Technology in the Classroom

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

During the pandemic, most schools turned to remote learning as a matter of necessity. Some in the education biz think that the pandemic has created a new market for their products. Actually, most parents and students are eager for real schools with real teachers to open again. Contrary to popular myth, teachers too want schools to reopen, as soon as they are safe for staff and students.

Historian Victoria E.M. Cain of Northeastern University has written an engaging account of the hype associated with new technology in the classroom. It is a tool, it should be used appropriately, but it is not a replacement for teachers.

She writes:

The lessons for today’s enthusiasts are clear. It is wise to be humble about the possibilities of classroom technology. No one would deny that technology can provide invaluable tools to improve learning. (What teacher today would not want to have classroom access to the internet?) Too often, though, instead of being seen as a tool to help schools, new technology has been embraced as a silver-bullet solution to daunting educational crises. In desperate times, desperate leaders have clutched at overblown promises, investing in unproven ideas without demanding reasonable evidence of efficacy. 

In the current pandemic, it might be tempting for education leaders to hope that if only we can find the right balance of learning management systems, home Wi-Fi access, and teacher training, we can continue to provide the same education we always have, virus or no virus. But it is not that easy, and it never has been.  

If we have learned anything from the past two centuries, it is this: New technologies provide assistance, not solutions. Whether it was Lancasterian school buildings in the 19th century, television in the 20th, or Zoom classrooms today, new technology will not solve our problems on its own. In the past, overhasty investment has wasted millions of dollars. Perhaps more pernicious, it has given well-meaning reformers false confidence that they have taken care of the issue. It is far better to take an approach that might not be popular or simple, one that acknowledges the scope of the crisis and the variety of solutions we will need to address it. We need to avoid the temptation to grasp too quickly at a single technological response. 

Wise counsel. Hope and hoax are both four-letter words that start with the same two letters. Hype is also a four-letter word.

Related posts

New Jersey’s Bad Idea: Using PARCC as a Graduation Requirement

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Oklahoma: Teacher Walkout Ends

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

New Research: Spending DOES Make a Difference, Especially for the Poorest Children

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

The Secret of Finland’s Amazing Success

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Trump Calls on Nation to Condemn “Racism, Bigotry, and White Supremacy.” I Therefore Condemn Donald Trump.

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

What Did Ted Cruz Do When Carly Disappeared?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

New Jersey: Is Chris Christie Still Governor?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Peter Greene to Mike Petrilli: A Not So Fond Farewell to “Reform”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Steve Nelson: Kavanaugh Lacks Judicial Temperament

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment