Accountability Elections Trump

Wall Street Journal: Time for Trump to Concede

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

The Wall Street Journal is one of the most conservative editorial voices in the nation. Today its editorial says that the Electoral College has decided the election. Biden won. Trump lost. Trump should concede.

The Electoral College meets Monday to cast its votes for President, officially marking Joe Biden as the election winner. President Trump’s legal challenges have run their course, and he and the rest of the Republican Party can help the country and themselves by acknowledging the result and moving on.

Mr. Trump’s last legal gasp came Friday evening when the Supreme Court declined to hear the Texas lawsuit seeking to overturn the election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. As we predicted, the Court cited Texas’s lack of legal standing to challenge how another state manages its elections. 

Some on the right claim that Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, but this is wrong. The Justices said they would have taken the Texas case as a “bill of complaint” when states sue other states. 

This is a technical point that concerns the Court’s case management, and the two Justices have a long-time view that the Court should hear more of these direct state appeals. We happen to agree, but in this case the Texas claim was outside constitutional bounds. Justice Alito (joined by Justice Thomas) added that he would “not grant other relief.” This was not a dissent on the merits of the Texas claim.

Mr. Trump and his camp are attacking the Court, and the President is deriding the “standing” point as a dodge. It is much more than that. Limits on standing are fundamental to a conservative understanding of the proper judicial role under Article III of the Constitution. If anyone can sue without a cognizable injury and the possibility of remedy, the courts would be overwhelmed with frivolous claims.

There is more to the editorial but I don’t subscribe and this is the free content available to me. Note: Even if Alito and Thomas had dissented, which they did not, the vote would have been a decisive 7-2 against Trump’s frivolous claim. It was 9-0 against Trump’s frivolous claim. At what point do courts begin to fine and punish lawyers for repeatedly filing frivolous claims?

Related posts

Puerto Rico: PR Supreme Court Approves Privatization of Public Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Washington Post: Many in GOP Base Share Trump Love for Putin Strongman Style

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

South Carolina: Teachers Fearful About Returning for In-Person Instruction

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Minnesota: Governor Dayton Blocks Reformers’ Efforts to Grant Licenses to Uncertified Teachers

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

FAIR: How the Media Turn Support for Public Schools into Opposition to Children of Color

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Los Angeles: Charter Expansion Becomes a Stumbling Block in Contract Negotiations

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Jere Hochman: The St. Louis Story

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Tennessee: “Achievement School District” Continues to Show Very Low Test Scores

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

FAIRTEST EMERGENCY ALERT: STOP THE DOE ACCOUNTABILITY REGULATIONS

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment